A Single Comment — Permalink
© ICCforum.com, 2010–2024. All rights reserved. Policies | Guidelines
Featured Comments
- agusmogni: Sentencing Guidelines of the International Criminal Court: Analysis of Its Jurisprudence and Comparison With Ad Hoc Tribunals I. Introduction The purpose of this comment is to provide a qualitative analysis of the sentences handed down by the International Criminal Court (ICC), to evaluate the criteria used to determine and establish the sentence in the various cases that have reached this level. Given that the content... (more)
- Pilgrim: Casting a Wider Net: Why the ICC Should Prosecute All Levels of the Criminal Hierarchy I. Introduction The International Criminal Court (the ICC or the Court) has convicted only ten people after investigations of dozens of situations involving the murder, rape, and torture of millions.1 This statistic is problematic for the Court across many dimensions and demands a reevaluation of first... (more)
- AA375: Political Implications of Ambiguities in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) is responsible for prosecuting the most severe crimes facing the global community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.1 At the surface level, prosecuting the aforementioned crimes may appear clear and straightforward. However, the ICC... (more)
- Milton Owuor: Why the Question of the Sufficiency of Gravity in the Rome Statute Remains Problematic I. Prelude The requirement of “sufficient gravity”, as one of the bases to determine the admissibility threshold for cases under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC), is a matter that has generated considerable scholarly discourse. The concept of gravity threshold is incredibly critical at almost every stage of the... (more)
- Muhammad Muzahidul... Summary Gravity issue is very important both for the Office of the Prosecution (OTP) and the International Criminal Court (the Court or ICC) for the selection of ‘situations’ and ‘cases’. Through the Rome Statute ICC is mandated to try four crimes i.e. genocide, war crime, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. All the four crimes are serious in nature. The prohibition of those four crimes had already attained the norms of jus cogens; because the nations of... (more)
- Melis: The Function of the Gravity Analysis in the International Criminal Court’s Mandate to End Impunity I. Introduction Article 17 of the Rome Statute provides that a case must be of sufficient gravity to justify action by the International Criminal Court (ICC).1 Thus, the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) considers the gravity of crime in its case selection process. As outlined in its 2016... (more)
- asykora: In Selecting Cases to Investigate and Prosecute, How Wide Should the Prosecutor’s Aperture Be? I. Introduction The very first article of the Rome Statute establishing the ICC states that the Court “shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international concern.”1 Article 5 elaborates this point, stating:... (more)
- Patrick King: I. Introduction From its inception, the International Criminal Court (ICC or the Court) has set out to address and adjudicate only those cases of most serious concern to the international community as a whole.1 Gravity is a crucial concept in the operation of the International Criminal Court. Despite its importance to the ICC, and, in particular, to the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), gravity is left largely undefined by the... (more)
- eboldis: An Expressivist Approach to Case Selection Introduction As the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) noted: Criminal investigation and prosecution […] is unavoidably selective in any system. […] Selectivity is part of the history of international criminal jurisdictions, and an inevitable consequence of establishing an international criminal court or tribunal.1 This is even more true for the... (more)
- ramyaswami: Aperture of the Prosecutor: Reconciling the Concerns of the International Community with Political Influences I. Introduction In selecting cases to investigate and prosecute under her Article 15 powers, there is contention about how wide the Prosecutor’s aperture should be.1 Under the Rome Statute, the ICC prosecutor must abide by an extensive list of rules and... (more)
- madhavi.narayanan: Reversing the ICC’s Case Selection Process I. Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) is constantly in a state of struggle to prove that it is an effective, legitimate institution. Because there are literally hundreds of situations of grave crimes to choose from, which cases the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) decides to select signals to the broader international community how it is acting on its... (more)
- jak223: The Prosecutor’s Aperture and the Deterrent Effect of the ICC A primary goal of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is to deter future perpetrators from committing crimes considered by the international community to be the most grave or serious. “Without justice, conflicts, atrocities and fear would reign free.”1 This justice is accomplished by holding past perpetrators accountable for those crimes via prosecutions and... (more)
Comment on the Gravity Question: “What is the universe of cases upon which the ICC should focus? What should be the threshold for the gravity that warrants investigation of a situation or prosecution of those most responsible?”
Greetings, just wanted to comment on one of the Articles that discussed how a Prosecutor should pick which case they decide to investigate. I believe whole heartedly that as a Criminal Investigator and Prosecutor you should choose your cases wisely, just as a fighter you must pick and choose your battles wisely.