Efficiency Lecture Question
In what ways could the ICC’s bureaucracy, finances, judicial election process, and relationship with the States Parties be reformed to increase its efficiency as an instrument for international justice?
Comment on the Efficiency Lecture Question: “In what ways could the ICC’s bureaucracy, finances, judicial election process, and relationship with the States Parties be reformed to increase its efficiency as an instrument for international justice?”
An efficient Court Operation,
1. is for the purpose too attain the ends of Justice, and
2. where Jurisdiction is not possessed, as Limited de facto, or as Limited without an agreement, has in agreement in principal to part 1.
Being a War Organ, the states combined whether by virtue of Romes Statute or Act, have inherent authority and jurisdiction to apply to the court of jurisdiction where the accused rests...that Court of Law and Act has inherent authority to endorse the warrant, whether in agreement or not that Romes Statute exists is de facto, the relationship of Judge and Justice must always be combined, whether in agreement or De Facto.
At all material times even when in agreement, a Supreme Court has inherent jurisdiction to quash an international allegation. example- Alexandia [greek] [city related act], Rome [Italy and many others] [state related act]. At all material times all are beside each other being Citizens are Supreme Court, and the local Supreme Courts were acted to be affirmed and reaffirmed from the War Organ for Justice Act.
Therefore the preliminary hearing could be heard locally when no agreement exists, and transferred for the protection and to keep independent from local persecution the local Supreme Court Justice, of the state party hearing allegation to approve the international War Organ Court Act. [Statute of Rome].
The form would be produced internationally private same as any other warranted required to touch information laid, the signature and seal approving the act is endorsed by the supreme court usually filed by a Clerk, or deputy sheriff, and that Organ would deliver the diplomatic package as supreme court endorsed the movement.
May also provide, locally, a level of communication and rights being preserved. Where the form could be used, "to Call for the aid of all Superior Courts".
The Charter of Romes Families provide- the Family unit comes Before State, and exists before State can. A Justice of the Supreme Courts is that Fact.
Reference and trainer- Honorable McIntyre- Supreme Court Canada[1982-], Docket 19518, 19234, and 17760.
M. Cherif Bassiouni
Professor of Law
Comment on the Efficiency Lecture Question: “In what ways could the ICC’s bureaucracy, finances, judicial election process, and relationship with the States Parties be reformed to increase its efficiency as an instrument for international justice?”
An efficient Court Operation,
1. is for the purpose too attain the ends of Justice, and
2. where Jurisdiction is not possessed, as Limited de facto, or as Limited without an agreement, has in agreement in principal to part 1.
Being a War Organ, the states combined whether by virtue of Romes Statute or Act, have inherent authority and jurisdiction to apply to the court of jurisdiction where the accused rests...that Court of Law and Act has inherent authority to endorse the warrant, whether in agreement or not that Romes Statute exists is de facto, the relationship of Judge and Justice must always be combined, whether in agreement or De Facto.
At all material times even when in agreement, a Supreme Court has inherent jurisdiction to quash an international allegation. example- Alexandia [greek] [city related act], Rome [Italy and many others] [state related act]. At all material times all are beside each other being Citizens are Supreme Court, and the local Supreme Courts were acted to be affirmed and reaffirmed from the War Organ for Justice Act.
Therefore the preliminary hearing could be heard locally when no agreement exists, and transferred for the protection and to keep independent from local persecution the local Supreme Court Justice, of the state party hearing allegation to approve the international War Organ Court Act. [Statute of Rome].
The form would be produced internationally private same as any other warranted required to touch information laid, the signature and seal approving the act is endorsed by the supreme court usually filed by a Clerk, or deputy sheriff, and that Organ would deliver the diplomatic package as supreme court endorsed the movement.
May also provide, locally, a level of communication and rights being preserved. Where the form could be used, "to Call for the aid of all Superior Courts".
The Charter of Romes Families provide- the Family unit comes Before State, and exists before State can. A Justice of the Supreme Courts is that Fact.
Reference and trainer- Honorable McIntyre- Supreme Court Canada[1982-], Docket 19518, 19234, and 17760.