A Single Comment — Permalink
© ICCforum.com, 2010–2025. All rights reserved. Policies | Guidelines
Featured Comments
- huangz2024: Definition and Application of “Interest of Justice” I. Overview The concept of “interests of justice” as outlined in the Rome Statute1 is complicated and subject to criticism for its lack of uniformity. The term “not serve the interests of justice” was used by the Pre-Trial Chamber (PTC) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2019 to reject the initiation of an... (more)
- Milton Owuor: The Deferral Request Under Article 18(2) of the Rome Statute as an Emerging Tradition in the Context of Complementarity: The Situation in Afghanistan I. Prelude: An Emerging Tradition in Complementarity This discourse seeks to engage critically with the overarching legal issues basically revolving around the deferral request under Article 18(2) of the Rome Statute in the aftermath of the Taliban takeover of power in Afghanistan. Article... (more)
- bulut2023: Using Article 53 of the Rome Statute to Incorporate Alternative Justice Mechanisms into the International Criminal Court’s Jurisprudence and Practice I. Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) has faced criticism for failing to incorporate non-Western legal traditions and practices, as well as other alternative justice mechanisms, into its jurisprudence and practice. This criticism is justified, as... (more)
- Sydney Siwinski: Using Cultural Context to Award More Meaningful and Salient Remedies to Victims I. Introduction The Rome Statute mandates both categories of remedies available to the International Criminal Court (ICC) as well as, in many cases, the individuals to whom remedies can be awarded.1 However, the ICC’s interpretation of justice and law comes mostly if not entirely from Western legal... (more)
- diabo: Colonialism and Considering Historical Context in the ICC I. Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) has come under the scrutiny of legal scholars for its reliance on Western ideas of justice and its disproportionate prosecution of non-Western actors. This criticism is based in the ICC’s foundational text, the Rome Statute, and the bases for investigation and... (more)
- janinaheller: International Criminal Court: The Potential for Complementarity with the Inter-American System I. Introduction In recent years, international law experts have begun to acknowledge the potential for learning opportunities and collaboration between the International Criminal Court (ICC) and regional human rights systems.1 They have also highlighted the important role that the Inter-American System has been playing over the years in... (more)
- HeavenStrouse: Article 53: Shifting From a Retributive Theory of Justice I. Introduction The western ideal of prosecution and punishment are frequently posited as the only legitimate modes of justice not only within the western world itself, but through the implementation of policies that define the power and effectiveness of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Looking directly at the ICC and the objectives it contends to... (more)
- Maggie Sheerin: A New ICC Justice Reflecting Regional Remedies: Reparations, Reconciliation, and Reform I. Introduction This comment will look at the various ways that the International Criminal Court (ICC) could improve its functionality as a global system, by looking to the regional human rights systems and the ways that they have each pulled from their unique regional histories, to create systems that fit their regional needs and... (more)
- etrevisani: When Non-Incarceration is Enough: Rethinking Inadmissibility Under Article 17 I. Introduction With the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the parallel development of bold new ideas surrounding restorative justice practices within the legal academy, the end of the twentieth century was a period of dramatic change for international transitional justice spaces.1 These practices reflect robust community... (more)
- karagon: Looking Beyond: A New Understanding of Justice for the ICC I. Introduction The creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 1998 was a milestone in the development of international human rights and forums for their vindication. The ICC is the world’s “first permanent court mandated to bring to justice people responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide when national... (more)
Comment on the Legal Traditions Question: “To what extent has the ICC under-represented non-Western laws, principles, rules, procedures, practices, or traditions in its legal structure and system?”
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an international tribunal established to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. It was founded in 2002 and is guided by the Rome Statute, which outlines its legal structure and system.
Critics have argued that the ICC has under-represented non-Western laws, principles, rules, procedures, practices, or traditions in its legal structure and system. Some key points raised in this regard include:
Jurisdictional Bias: Critics argue that the ICC's focus has predominantly been on crimes committed in Africa, which has led to accusations of regional bias. This focus has raised concerns about the representation of non-Western legal systems and the lack of attention given to crimes committed in other parts of the world.
Cultural Sensitivity: The ICC's legal system is based on a mix of civil and common law traditions, primarily influenced by European legal systems. Critics argue that this framework may not adequately account for the diverse legal traditions and cultural sensitivities of non-Western societies. They believe that greater efforts should be made to incorporate and understand different legal systems when interpreting and applying international criminal law.
Procedural Fairness: Some critics argue that the ICC's procedures and practices may not align with the legal traditions and practices of non-Western societies. For example, the adversarial nature of the court's proceedings and the heavy reliance on written evidence may not align with oral traditions and customary practices in some cultures.
The Role of Customary International Law: Critics claim that the ICC's emphasis on treaty-based law has limited the consideration and application of customary international law, which is developed through the consistent practice of states. This focus may result in underrepresentation of non-Western legal principles and practices rooted in customary international law.
It is important to note that the ICC has made efforts to address some of these concerns. The Court has taken steps to enhance its outreach to different regions and engage with diverse legal systems. Additionally, the ICC's rules of procedure and evidence allow for the consideration of relevant rules and principles of national legal systems. The Court also provides opportunities for affected states and interested organizations to participate in its proceedings and contribute to the development of international criminal law.
However, despite these efforts, criticisms regarding the under-representation of non-Western laws, principles, rules, procedures, practices, or traditions in the ICC's legal structure and system persist. The ongoing dialogue and engagement with diverse legal systems are essential to ensure the Court's effectiveness and legitimacy on a global scale.