The UN Security Council referred the Libyan situation to the ICC in Resolution 1970 on February 26, 2011. On March 3, 2011, the ICC Office of the Prosecutor opened an investigation. On June 27th, the ICC judges issued three arrest warrants, including one for Saif al-Islam Gaddafi (سيف الإسلام معمر القذافي) (hereinafter “S. Gaddafi”). The charges are that he is criminally responsible as an indirect co-perpetrator of two counts of crimes against humanity: murder and persecution under Article 7(1) of the Rome Statute.
In accordance with Resolution 1970, the ICC charges only address actions subsequent to February 15th. The charges arise from S. Gaddafi’s alleged role in murderous attacks on civilians after that date.
On October 20, 2011, Muammar Gaddafi was captured alive in Sirte and, while in custody, was killed under controversial circumstances. On November 19, S. Gaddafi was captured near Ubari in Southern Libya as he was reportedly trying to leave Libya for neighboring Niger. As of November 21st, he was being held in Zintan, Libya.
The principle of complementarity, set forth in Article 17 of the Rome Statute, provides (in relevant part):
(T)he Court shall determine that a case is inadmissible where: (a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is […] unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution;
In light of the international law on this matter, and other factors, should S. Gaddafi be tried by the National Transitional Council of Libya or the ICC? Who has the legal authority to make that decision? By what process should that decision be made? Should the ICC assess the capacity of Libya’s domestic legal system to give S. Gaddafi a fair trial? If so, what factors or standards should be used in deciding that question?
© ICCforum.com, 2010–2024. All rights reserved. Policies | Guidelines
Comment on the Libya Question: “Should Saif al-Islam Gaddafi be tried by the National Transitional Council of Libya or by the International Criminal Court?”
Libya is in a state of transition, which raises doubts about its ability to conduct a fair and impartial trial of Saif al-Islam Gaddafi. More specifically, Article 17(2) of the Rome Statute provides that the ICC should consider whether the accused shall be given a trial with the intent to bring him or her to justice. Most telling is the language found under (c) of that provision which states the ICC shall have conduct trials where: "in the circumstances, is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice".
Maybe a stronger legal basis can be found elsewhere in the Rome Statute, but this language does tend to highlight the concern of the Court to ensure that in addition to escaping impunity, the accused be given a fair trial "with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice". In a transitional situation, the Prosecutor may very well determine that the political environment would be inconsistent with such an intent.
Either way, if Libya does take umbrage at this assumption then it does have the power under Article 19 of the Rome Statute to challenge the admissibility of the Saif al-Islam Gaddafi case before the ICC. I think that is one of the important things to consider: ICC jurisdiction is not instantly a settled matter. States - or the accused - can challenge the ICC jurisdiction on Article 17 grounds.
Does the whole thing ultimately become a question of burden-shifting?