Summary; The Africa questions in regards to ICC moderation are the same as those found in the policing of African American Communities in the United States. Essentially the actors reply is singly, "We have investigated ourselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing." The court should consider that the "international" addition to their name implies that they are not the sole arbiters of what is to be considered justified indictment. If the court is to lose the cooperation of the AU block then the court will have the power to approach no other parties as we see they are relatively powerless in the grand scale against countries like Indonesia who are at least powerful enough to escape any investigation into the ongoing atrocities in West Papua New Guinea. We can expect that none of the living actors in the East Timor debacle will be pursued. These are just small examples that could be replicated in many geographic areas outside of Africa that the African governments are referring to when they say that the attention is wholly inappropriate as the world is in fact round and Africa is not in a corner that it should be particularly perused out of convenience and ease of the court looking busy.

Conclusion; If the court continues to pursue the easiest indictments at the behest of the Security Council or not, their image will be irreversibly tainted on the African Continent and it will take another round of manufactured coups to empower another generation of tyrants who can then commit officially sanctioned atrocities. .

Excuse the spelling and grammar please.