While the use of bounty hunters may be an effective solution to the arrest issue, the idea of immunizing private parties who claim to act as bounty hunters strikes me as particularly troubling and impractical. A carte blanche for bounty hunters to arrest suspected war criminals by a wide variety of means seems to be a slippery slope, and a plan with which few nations would likely agree. Many countries, including world powers, but also nations in which war criminals “hide out,” would likely vehemently oppose this type of incursion on state sovereignty. Immunity may also legitimize means of arresting suspects that are not condoned by the international community, or even provide a shield to illegal and violent acts in the name of “international justice.” Instituting a licensing scheme would not likely reign in the actions of bounty hunters, particularly when the oversight or approval is tasked to the ICC itself, where resources are already scarce. The authority or precedent to provide immunity also seems lacking. The immunity of UN officials, rooted in a worldwide, well established, and widely accepted institution, is a far cry from providing immunity to private actors.